arXiv:1901.06830 Date: submitted by
2019-01-21 Author(s): Soumya Basu
, David Easley
, Maureen O'Hara
, Emin Gün Sirer
Blockchain-based cryptocurrencies prioritize transactions based on their fees, creating a unique kind of fee market. Empirically, this market has failed to yield stable equilibria with predictable prices for desired levels of service. We argue that this is due to the absence of a dominant strategy equilibrium in the current fee mechanism. We propose an alternative fee setting mechanism that is inspired by generalized second price auctions. The design of such a mechanism is challenging because miners can use any criteria for including transactions and can manipulate the results of the auction after seeing the proposed fees. Nonetheless, we show that our proposed protocol is free from manipulation as the number of users increases. We further show that, for a large number of users and miners, the gain from manipulation is small for all parties. This results in users proposing fees that represent their true utility and lower variance of revenue for miners. Historical analysis shows that Bitcoin users could have saved $272,528,000 USD in transaction fees while miners could have reduced the variance of fee income by an average factor of 7.4 times.
Akbarpour, M. and and S. Li, 2018, Credible Mechanisms, Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 371-371.
Aune, R., A. Krellenstein, M. OHara, and O. Slama, 2017, Footprints on a Blockchain: Trading and Information Leakage in Distributed Ledgers. Journal of Trading, 12 (2), page 5-13.
Bohme, R., N. Christin, B. Edelman, and T. Moore, 2015. Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29, 213-238.
Cong, L., Z. He and J. Li, 2018, Decentralized Mining in Centralized Pools, SSRN, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3143724
Easley, D. and J. Kleinberg, 2010, Networks, Crowds and Markets, Cambridge University Press.
Easley, D., M. O’Hara and S. Basu, 2017, From Mining to Markets: The Evolution of Bitcoin Transactions Fees, Journal of Financial Economics, forthcoming.
Edelman, B. and M. Schwartz, 2010, Optimal Auction Design and Equilibrium Selection in Sponsored Search Auctions, American Economic Review, May 2010, Vol. 100, No. 2: Pages 597-602.
Eyal, I. and E. Sirer, 2014, Majority is Not Enough: Bitcoin Mining is Vulnerable. In Financial Cryptography and Data Security, Christin, N., Safavi-Naini, R. (Eds.), Springer Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 436-454.
Gans, J. and H. Halaburda, 2015, Some Economics of Private Digital Currency. In Goldfarb, A., Greenstein, S.M., Tucker, C. E. (Eds.), Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, Chapter 9.
Gandel, N. and H. Halaburda, 2016, Can We Predict the Winner in a Market with Network Effects? Competition in cryptocurrency market, Games, 7 (3), 1-21.
Harvey, C., 2016, Cryptofinance, SSSRN, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2438299
Huberman, G., J. Leshno and C. Moallemi, 2017, Monopoly Without a Monopolist: An Economic Analysis of the Bitcoin Pyament System, working paper, Columbia Business School.
Houy, N., 2014, The Bitcoin Mining Game, available at SSRN, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2407834
Jackson, M. and I. Kremer, 2006, The Relevance of a Choice of Auction Format in a Competitive Environment, Review of Economic Studies, Volume 73, Issue 4, Pages 961-981.
Lavi, R., O. Sattath and A. Zohar, 2017, Redesigning Bitcoin’s Fee Market, arXiv:1709.08881.
Ma, J., J. Gans and R. Tourky, 2018, Market Structure in Bitcoin Mining, NBER Working Paper No 24242.
Malinova, K. and A. Park, 2016, Market Design with Blockchain Technology. SSRN, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm?abstractid=2785626
Milgrom, R., The Economics of Competitive Bidding: A Selective Survey, in Social Goal and Social Organization: Essays in Memory of Elisha Pazner, L. Hurwicz, D. Schmeidler and H. Sonnenschein (eds), Cambridge University Press, 261-289.
Myerson, R., 1981, Optimal Auction Design, Mathematics of Operations Research, Mathematics of Operations Research, Vol. 6, No. 1., pp. 58-73.
Raskin, M. and D. Yermack, 2018, Digital Currencies, Decentralized Ledgers and the Future of Central Banking. In: Conti-Brown, P., Lastra, R., (Eds.), Research Handbook on Central Banking, Edward Elgar, Publishing, 474-486.
Raskin, M. and D. Yermack, 2017. Corporate Governance and Blockchains. Review of Finance, 21, 7-31.
Rosenfeld, M, 2011, Analysis of Bitcoin Pooled Mining Reward Systems, http://arxiv.org/pdf/1112.4980v1.pdf
Swinkles, J., Efficiency of Large Private Auctions, 2001, Econometrica, 69, 37-68.
Weber, R., 1983, Multi-Object Auctions, in Auctions, Bidding, and Contracting: Uses and Theory, R. Engelbrecht-Wiggans, M. Shubik and R. Stark (eds), New York University Press, 165-191.
Yao, A., 2018, An Incentive Analysis of some Bitcoin Fee Designs, arXiv:1811.02351.
Bitcoin-Kioske stellen keine Verbindung zu einer Bank her und erheben möglicherweise Transaktionsgebühren in Höhe von bis zu 7% und Wechselkurse von USD 50 gegenüber anderen Standorten. Es wurde geschätzt, dass im Jahr 2016 weltweit mehr als 800 Bitcoin-Geldautomaten in Betrieb waren, wobei die Mehrheit (mehr als 500) in den Vereinigten Staaten lag. Could Bitcoin replace the U.S. dollar as the global reserve currency? According to Coinbase Cofounder/CEO Brian Armstrong, the answer is yes. He predicted that the digital currency may very well supplant the greenback by 2030.  However, to achieve this milestone, Bitcoin needs to overcome several obstacles. Despite Bitcoin’s current downturn, universities are increasingly opening up educational projects for blockchain technology reports Econotimes, with the number of universities and educational facilities running blockchain and cryptocurrency courses growing as financial markets expand and absorb more blockchain-related products.. There are now many opportunities for blockchain developers but ... bitcoin. Nilai bitcoin 400 juta USD telah hilang kerana berlaku kegagalan dalam rangkaian Mt. Gox pada Februari 2014. Penggodaman NiceHash yang berpangkalan di Slovenia pada penghujung 2017 menyaksikan kecurian bitcoin yang bernilai 70 juta USD. Coincheck turut menjadi mangsa penggodaman oleh penjenayah siber yang mengakibatkan kehilangan bitcoin yang bernilai 530 juta USD. Pada 7 Mei 2019 ... may prevent use of Bitcoin as a currency (Iwamura et al., 2014b; Yermack, 2015). There are numerous comparisons of the volatility of Bitcoin against many widely-used currencies, like USD or EUR (i.e., McDonnell, 2014; Yermack, 2015). Bitcoin volatility tends to decrease with trading volume, and consequently, volatilities of emerging market
🛑 Turkey's President Erdogan wants a Central bank Digital Currency (CBDC). The European Union wants consideration of a Eurocoin. Coinbase's legal Chief wants... Nov 1, 2019 - XRP/USD 2019 Q2 performance recap From there, XRP really showed strength. Over about a week, it's price pumped from below $0.30 to impressively clear $0.45. Heading into June, the ... The National Bank of Cambodia (NBC) is readying a central bank digital currency (CBDC) to be launched at some point during the current fiscal quarter. Chea S... According to the World Bank latest Migration and Development Brief annual remittance flows to low- and middle-income countries reached a new record at $529 billion in 2018. At the same time the ... The 1st Central Bank to issue a digital currency and they transferred it to the IMF! Source in video: https://www.ledgerinsights.com/tunisia-issues-central-b...